Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur, the incumbent Member of Parliament representing Bhopal under the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), finds herself at the centre of a political storm following her exclusion from the party’s initial candidate list for the 2024 Lok Sabha elections. Her absence from the roster stems from a sequence of controversial statements she made in the past, which, according to her, might have incurred the disapproval of Prime Minister Narendra Modi.
In her candid acknowledgement of the situation, Thakur confessed, “I did not seek a ticket before, and I am not seeking one now. The use of certain words in my previous statements might not have pleased Prime Minister Modi, and he had expressed that I wouldn’t be forgiven. However, I had already apologized to him earlier.” This admission sheds light on the delicate balance between political alignment and individual expression within the BJP’s ranks.
The BJP’s subsequent decision to replace Pragya Singh Thakur with Alok Sharma, a former mayor, comes against the backdrop of her ongoing trial in connection with the September 2008 Malegaon bomb blast case. The intricacies of her legal entanglement juxtapose with her political aspirations, reflecting the complexities inherent in the intersection of law and governance.
Pragya Singh Thakur’s political journey garnered significant attention during the 2019 Lok Sabha elections when she secured a resounding victory over Congress heavyweight Digvijaya Singh by an impressive margin of 3,64,822 votes. However, her tenure has been marked by a series of controversies that have cast a shadow over her political achievements.
Before the 2019 elections, Thakur faced intense criticism for her remarks about Hemant Karkare, an esteemed officer and former Maharashtra anti-terrorism squad (ATS) chief. She drew ire for comparing Karkare to mythological characters Ravan and Kans, particularly in the context of his demise during the 26/11 Mumbai terror attacks. The resultant outcry prompted a show-cause notice from the Election Commission of India (ECI) and forced the BJP to distance itself from her, underscoring the impact of her rhetoric on the party’s image.
The controversy surrounding Pragya Singh Thakur intensified with her praise of Nathuram Godse, the assassin of Mahatma Gandhi, whom she hailed as a patriot. Despite issuing an apology, her remarks continued to elicit condemnation from various quarters, including Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who unequivocally denounced them as “extremely condemnable.” Modi’s vocal disapproval underscored the gravity of Thakur’s statements and the irreparable damage they inflicted on her political standing.
National Media – your fastest source for breaking news! Read now.
Modi’s unequivocal stance on the matter was further solidified during his declaration that he would never forgive Pragya Singh Thakur for her disparaging remarks about Mahatma Gandhi’s assassin. His words reverberated across political circles, underscoring the significance of ideological alignment and the non-negotiable principles that govern the BJP’s ethos.
The confluence of Thakur’s exclusion from the candidate list, her legal entanglements, and the string of controversies she’s embroiled in paints a complex portrait of a political figure grappling with the ramifications of her words and actions. As the BJP navigates through the fallout of this decision, it underscores the intricate interplay between personal convictions, party politics, and public perception, underscoring the perennial tension between individual expression and collective responsibility within the realm of governance.
